Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution.Importer.createControl
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution.Importer.createControl
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:47:47 +0800
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 14:30 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 08:15, Not Zed wrote:
> > void createControl (out Bonobo::Control control);
> >
> > Shouldn't this just return the value for api consistency?
>
> It is consistent with the shell createControls call because that creates
> multiple controls.
Ugh.
> > Passing around pointers to stuff is ugly as hell in c.
>
> What are you passing around?
The out pointer?
> > And if we're going to change the interfaces anyway, can we ditch the
> > horribly awful to implement processItem rubbish, and just have loadFile
> > be synchronous, please?
>
> I would be fine with this as long as there is a solution for the
> progress stuff. I think that is the primary reason stuff is done this
> way now.
Isn't the progress stuff just handled in the importer itself?
Well it will be in the mailer anyway, whatever the rest does.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]