Re: [Evolution-hackers] 2 separate addressbooks? why?

On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 19:46, Chris Toshok wrote:
> So I was looking through the code after reading ross's default
> addressbook patch.  Didn't we decide that having multiple local
> addressbooks wasn't necessary?  I mean, you can separate contacts by
> using categories.
> And if we ever get around to writing the code to save searches (and
> display them as subfolders in the source list), we can provide 2 default
> ones (anything with Business in the category list for "Work", and
> anything without Business as "Personal.")

We in fact talked about getting rid of the concept of "default"
addressbooks/calendars all together.  Preferring to have each
application that used the default to configure itself more

JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]