Re: [Evolution-hackers] 2 separate addressbooks? why?

On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 15:14, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 19:46, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > So I was looking through the code after reading ross's default
> > addressbook patch.  Didn't we decide that having multiple local
> > addressbooks wasn't necessary?  I mean, you can separate contacts by
> > using categories.
> > 
> > And if we ever get around to writing the code to save searches (and
> > display them as subfolders in the source list), we can provide 2 default
> > ones (anything with Business in the category list for "Work", and
> > anything without Business as "Personal.")
> We in fact talked about getting rid of the concept of "default"
> addressbooks/calendars all together.  Preferring to have each
> application that used the default to configure itself more
> appropriately.

Oh I didn't mean default as in e_book_get_default_addressbook.  I meant
we'd create those folders/searches when first populating the .evolution
directory.  Kinda like the initial set of VFolders the mailer creates.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]