Re: [Evolution-hackers] picky libdb3 requirements

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 20:36, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > Hear hear.  I suggest libgda/libgnomedb.  The mailing list is quite
> > active and the folks on it helpful.  The layer of abstraction might be
> > nice for configuration geeks, too.  Not to mention allowing easy support
> > of multiple database formats.
> except that none of these things matter... and would only make things
> worse (if you think a dep on libdb3-3.1.17 is bad...)

Yeah I don't think we want to add another heavy dependency like libgda
-- especially given that we do only very basic stuff with the address
book.  We don't even use all the db3 features.

-- Ettore

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]