Re: Another approach to build without GNOME



Hello Ross.

Let's discuss it on mailing list, probably someone else will join. And
Carlos is on vacation I suppose.

В Срд, 02/05/2007 в 16:59 +0100, Ross Burton пишет:
> Nickolay,
> 
> You've been doing a great job of rapidly reviewing my Evince patches,
> tiny though they be.  Fancy something more substantial? :)

Thanks, it wasn't hard really :)

> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328842
> 
> I've just attached an all-new and leaner patch.  Comments would be
> greatly appreciated.


> Attached is a patch that takes the point of view that not all of GNOME is evil.
> 
> - libgnomeui BAD
> - libgnome BAD
> - gnome-vfs WE CAN LIVE WITH
> - gnome-keyring BEST FRIENDS FOREVER
> 
> It's not 100% finished:
> - help doesn't work (can't spawn a web browser)
> - MIME icons are empty (this can be fixed and the libgnomeui dependency removed
> too)
> 

Well, with gnome-vfs it's probably sensible at least it follows current GNOME direction
as others understand it. Although mine opinion is that we shouldn't drop required
features just because they belong to libgnome (aren't we developing GNOME application?)
probably others think differently.

Btw, what is the purpose of the changes? Do you want to have Maemo or Windows port?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: =?koi8-r?Q?=FC=D4=C1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=DE=C1=D3=D4=D8?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=D1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=D0=CF=C4=D0=C9=D3=C1=CE=C1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=C3=C9=C6=D2=CF=D7=CF=CA?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=D0=CF=C4=D0=C9=D3=D8=C0?=



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]