Re: Still Font Discrepancies?
- From: Pat Suwalski <pat suwalski net>
- To: uws+gnome xs4all nl, evince-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Still Font Discrepancies?
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:18:29 -0400
Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
>> http://www.testors.com/tes_cds/color_charts/4600_MM_(Acrylic).pdf
>
> However, none of these fonts (or a subset) is embedded in the document,
> causing Evince to fallback to regular FontConfig font lookups. It is likely
> you don't have these fonts on your system (try with fc-list), so you end up
> with whatever the default is (most likely Bitstream Vera or DejaVu). Since
> the metrics for this font do not match the metrics of the actually intended
> fonts, you get horizontal shifting effects: overlapping letters and ugly
> kerning.
So, then the question is, what did acroread on the same computer do to
display it properly. What it displayed is definitely Garamond and
Helvetica Condensed, by my trained eye. :)
Regarding use friendliness, I wonder if it would make sense to display a
messagebox like some programs do that the document contains fonts that
are not on the system and the display might look odd.
--Pat
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]