Re: Archive integration project



2013/8/19 Claudio Saavedra <csaavedra gnome org>:
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 11:19 +0800, 藍挺瑋 wrote:
Hi!

I have sent 12 patches to bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705599

Great, thank you!

These patches implement archives extraction. Are these patches too
many? What should I do after uploading these patches?

The number of patches is not important. What matters is that each patch
implements an atomic change that can be tested independently and that
each patch in the sequence depends only on previous patches.

Also, if there are refactorings or bug fixes that are independent from
your work and could be integrated separately, it would be preferable to
attach them to new bug reports.

I have not reviewed your patches yet so I don't know whether that's the
case, but I wanted to answer your question. I hope this helps.

I do not start working on archives creation in Epiphany because I
cannot think of a way to do this. It seems uploading is handled in
WebKit, and I don't know how to create an archive only on demand.

I am not sure what do you mean with archive creation in the context of
Epiphany? Do you mean, allowing an user to create an archive when trying
to upload a file to a webpage (for instance, when attaching a file in
gmail)?

If that's the case, maybe GtkFileChooser would be the right place?


The problem is that creating an archive may take a lot of time. I
think creating an archive after GtkFileChooser is completed is the
only way. However, users have to wait until the archive is created. If
just creating the archive asynchronously, WebKit may report wrong
information to the web page.


Claudio

_______________________________________________
epiphany-list mailing list
epiphany-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]