Re: Firefox plugins in Epiphany

["Olafur Arason" <olafra gmail com>]

I think a better system would be to stub the XPCom function
and implement those that the extension use and use
dbus to communicate. Because firefox is better at handling
there extensions.

Olafur Arason

On 3/11/07, Reinout van Schouwen <reinouts gnome org> wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Op zondag 11-03-2007 om 15:02 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Benjamin
> Gramlich:
>
> > Would it ever be possible to allow epiphany to support Firefox
> > plugins?
>
> Epiphany already supports Mozilla plugins such as the Acrobat Reader
> plugin. In case you're talking about Firefox extensions: the short
> answer is No. The long answer is: Some extensions can be ported (Adblock
> is one example) but they cannot run without modification. Javascript-GTK
> bindings would need to be written first for that to be feasible at all.
>
> regards,
>
> --
> Reinout van Schouwen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> epiphany-list mailing list
> epiphany-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list