On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 17:14 +1100, Peter Harvey wrote: > I think generalising the bookmarks system and saying 'it will be a > directed acyclic graph, where each node can be a topic and/or a > bookmark' would work, with 'each bookmark/topic belongs to each topic in > it's ancestry'. This admits both Epiphany style systems, user-defined > hierarchical systems like Firefox/Galeon, and many things in-between. I > have attached a possible IDL. Firefox smart bookmarks have icons associated with them, don't they? Galeon's do.... You know, this might just be crazy enough to work ;). But then again, it might not. Wouldn't this subtopic stuff conflict directly with your auto-hierarchy code? -- Adam Hooper <adamh densi com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part