Re: [Epiphany] Bookmarks window changes



Maybe you could have a "bookmark site" item in the menu.


On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 14:58, Jorn Baayen wrote:
> Hrm, I'd need editing of url myself since I tend to work like this:
> I visit a site, browse around a bit, and at some point I decide I want a
> bookmark. So I add it, but it's a pointer to a specific page in the
> site. But I sometimes want a bookmark to point to the main site, so I
> edit the url. (It'd also be nice to have an url field in the 'add
> bookmark' dialog.. maybe even a 'use main site' button next to it, or
> something)
> 
> Cheers
> 
> On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 14:20, bordoley@msu.edu wrote:
> > Marco Pesenti Gritti <mpgritti@oltrelinux.com> said:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 04:09, bordoley@msu.edu wrote:
> > > > I'm concerned about a recent change to the bookmarks ui which allows a user to
> > > > change the location of a bookmark. In particular, this makes accidentally
> > > > changing the location of a bookmark trivially easy, with no way to undo. 
> > > > Furthermore, these are bookmarks right, does it even make sense to allow the
> > > > user to change the location...
> > > 
> > > Thanks for this mail, I was about to ask to you to do so ;)
> > > The reason I did that change was mostly to not have all the uris clutter
> > > the list. I think that's a good change and we should keep it. I have no
> > 
> > Nod...from a layout perspective i agree with you it definately makes the
> > editor less cluttered looking and I support the change.
> > 
> > > objections making it read only myself (or a label). The reasons I had to
> > > not make it editable at beginning was more or less these you are saying.
> > > Someone argued it's sometimes necessary to change the url a bit, I'd
> > > like to learn about these cases. (ccing the man)
> > > It would be really cool if we could get a comment by some usability guru
> > > about this :)
> > 
> > I really fail to see the benefit of changing the address of a bookmark, since
> > its a pointer to a location. Admittedly, some times links go stale, but isn't
> > the prefered method of fixing a dead bookmark to delete it and create a new
> > one pointing at the new location? 
> > 
> > Regardless of whether you should be able to edit the address as a matter of
> > principle, the potential for loss of data is quite high and in the absence of
> > undo, i'm very uncomfortable with allowing editting of addresses in the
> > bookmark editor.
> > 
> > dave
> > _______________________________________________
> > Epiphany mailing list
> > Epiphany@mozdev.org
> > http://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Epiphany mailing list
> Epiphany@mozdev.org
> http://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany
-- 
		 .--= [ MArk Finlay - sisob ] =--.

        [ Gnome User's Board : www.gnomesupport.org/forums ]
    [ Public Key: http://evolvedoo.sf.net/sisobatericomdotnet.asc  ]

This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]