Re: [Epiphany] Re: 1.2 Plan

[Marco Pesenti Gritti <mpeseng tin it>]

On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 15:42, David Adam Bordoley wrote:
> Marco Pesenti Gritti writes:
> >> 
> >> 1.2 is the future version that will go on GNOME 2.6? If the answer is
> >> yes, I propose 2.0 as version number instead.
> > 
> > Yeah will go with 2.6 (hopefully ;), anyone has an opinion about this ?
> > I dont have one.
> 
> I think changing the release number to 2.0 would be version number bloat 
> really. The exception would be if we break compatibility with 1.0 somehow or 
> otherwise make rather large infrastructural changes. 
> 
> <snip/> 
> 
> >> IMHO some aspects of the toolbar code still need work, like DND: we need
> >> better cursors, change the ugly black line for something more useful
> >> (like a shaded image of the element we are DNDing), ... 
> > 
> > Yeah part of this need to be done in gtk though.
> 
> I think this should be switch the codebase to depend on gtk2.4 and use the 
> gtk_toolbar implementation and implement features we need there etc. 
> 
> > 
> >> > - Port to DBUS if it's included. We may be able to drop
> >> > libgnome/libgnomeui/libbonobo/libbonoboui dependecies. 
> >> 
> >> and use GNOSIS ;)
> > 
> > Hmmmm do not reveal super secret, super crack projects to the public :P 
> > 
> 
> I don't really think depending on d-bus at this time is appropriate. For the 
> time being Orbit/bonobo is the way to go in gnome and until there is desktop 
> agreement that dbus should be included in the desktop its better not to 
> depend on a new somewhat untested ipc mechanism. 

Sure "if it's included" == "if it's included in GNOME".

Are there any usability fixes that you think we should target for 1.2 ?

Marco