Re: Handling Bugs in EOG

["Lucas Rocha" <lucasr gnome org>]

Hei Claudio,

2007/6/25, Claudio Saavedra <csaavedra alumnos utalca cl>:
> On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 15:22 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> > Hi Claudio,
> >
> > 2007/6/24, Claudio Saavedra <csaavedra alumnos utalca cl>:
> > > On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 19:25 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - Don't spend much time working on the stable branch. Prioritize
> > > > things you can fix in trunk in the new code base. If there's no easy
> > > > fix for a bug in stable branch, don't work on that. We need to make
> > > > EOG shine for 2.20 release.
> > >
> > > Ok to resolve FIXED the following bugs then?
> > >
> > > http://live.gnome.org/EyeOfGnome/EogNg/FixedCrashers
> >
> > Yes, please.
> >
> > I'm not sure what makes more sense: closing as WONTFIX (from stable
> > branch perspective) or FIXED (from development branch perspective).
> > I've been using the former.
>
> I used FIXED for those clearly related to the job managing system and
> other obsolete bits of code.
>
> I closed *a lot* of bugs. More than I would've imagined. There are still
> some others which need some triagging (they may be related to
> accessibility, for example), but at least we're under the 75 bugs :-)

Nice job! Thanks! :-)

--lucasr