On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 16:55 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
Magdalen Berns <m berns thismagpie com> wrote:Twitter management seems like quite a lot for one person. Why not share the load of managing it among a few people?Twitter alone isn't too much work. I've managed the channel in the past, and it was pretty easy. Reasons to have one owner per channel: * you get a consistent voice across messages * the channel owner can schedule activity, to ensure regular posting, as well as coherence of the channel as a whole * it avoids errors, since one person has an overview of what has been posted (so you don't get multiple people posting the same message, for example) * because someone is maintaining the channel, they are able to reply to questions and discussion
I agree with Allan abouting consistency in the tone & schedule of the posts. That said, we would definitely love if one could reply to the comments & @replies under one's own identity esp. if they encounter some misconception or misinterpretation. Parth prth on irc://irc.freenode.net & irc://irc.gnome.org
Allan _______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list engagement-list gnome org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part