Re: Release notes: dislike of 'Shell' name

[Emily Gonyer <emilyyrose gmail com>]

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Andreas Nilsson <lists andreasn se> wrote:
> On 09/03/2012 01:43 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > IMO I'd rather ignore that a component like gnome-shell exists when
> > writing the user documentation bits.
> >
> > I'd rather talk about concepts and skip the implementation details,
> > meaning having categories such as:
> > - Lock Screen
> > - Overview Mode
> > - Top Panel (or whatever the thing is called)
> >    - more usage of app menu
> >    -
> > - General UI changes (gtk2+gtk3 stuff, theme updates, etc)
> > - Message Tray
> > - section per application names
> >    Only if something appears as an application in overview mode I'll use
> >    that (e.g. Disks, Files, Disk Usage Monitor, Image Viewer, etc). The
> >    internal name (nautilus) to me is meaningless for user bit of the
> >    release notes.
>
> I don't object to this approach. I think you have a point.
> - Andreas
>
> --
> marketing-list mailing list
> marketing-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

That makes sense to me too. From a users' perspective theres no reason
to go into details regarding individual packages.

Emily

-- 
Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius,
power and magic in it. -  Goethe

Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't
matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr.Seuss

Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that
counts can be counted. - Albert Einstein