Re: GNOME 3 Marketing - GNOME Shell
- From: Diego Escalante Urrelo <diegoe gnome org>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: Dave Neary <dneary gnome org>, marketing-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 3 Marketing - GNOME Shell
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:42:18 -0500
El jue, 01-04-2010 a las 08:27 -0400, Owen Taylor escribió:
There's always been the idea that the tent of GNOME is broader than the
GNOME desktop distribution and there is certainly room for other options
than GNOME Shell in there, but when we are selling the GNOME 3 desktop
we need to be selling a single thing.
Agree, you are right.
So how we message the choice - what are the terms that a distribution
should be using when talking about this choice. Should it simply be
(*) GNOME 3 - enhanced experience
( ) GNOME 2 - reduced hardware requirements
This is a perfect chance to craft those distribution guidelines we
sometimes talk about. We can ask distributors to specifically frame this
two options like that, with that wording. Otherwise they can break our
message by accident by choosing other words.
Not to hijack the thread but I wonder if someone would like to take a
look at what we could possibly include in such guidelines if they are
created.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]