Re: Issuing a press release about GNOME 3



On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 06:39:57AM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 18:53 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
PS. I'm still unclear about what opening the big tent means exactly -
does it mean having a number of criteria, and any application meeting
those criteria becomes part of GNOME? Does that imply abandoning the
release sets?

Yes, this is nothing really new. I heard Federico already thought about
it for a while. The details are very hard, however, yeah.. it would
abandon the release sets.
[snip]

I think certification is a good idea to try, if it's simple - just 2 or
3 levels. But abandoning the release sets would be a major mistake.

I imagine it would be combined. Only  a distinction between Platform and
apps. Perhaps additional 'really core'.

Almost no modules will actually meet all your certification levels. You
need things to be in release sets so they get that regular pressure to
keep up the standards and keep to the schedule, for every GNOME release.

That was something we were discussing. More suggestions are very
welcome.

Also things like new deprecations: if something is newly deprecated, how
to certify applications, or applications which were already certified.

I think they should be certified/included until the next major.

Basically we have ideas on how stuff should work, the details are just
very difficult.

Try extra stuff, but please don't abandon the release sets until 
something else is proven to be working.

I also don't see how this needs to be part of a GNOME 3.0.

The proposal is about changing stuff. Not about 3.0. The naming of 3.0
is just a small part.

However, I combining this with a version change is nice, it shows a
change in direction.

-- 
Regards,
Olav



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]