Re: gnome app pages (was confusingly Gnome Software Map)
- From: Claus Schwarm <c schwarm gmx net>
- To: marketing-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome app pages (was confusingly Gnome Software Map)
- Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:42:32 +0200
Hi,
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 16:02:23 +0100 (BST)
Joachim Noreiko <jnoreiko yahoo com> wrote:
That's all too much technical detail for wgo, and it
will detract from pages aimed at users.
Some more thoughts about the topic:
* What about the Windows port of Evolution? Say, a Windows uses
googles for 'email client': What address should he get provided we could
make Evolution one of the top links? wgo/apps/evolution ?
* What about apps providing a plugin interface: Nautilus, gedit or
Tomboy, for example. What's the sense in haveing a plugin interface if
the user needs Google to find plugins? But which page should promote the
plugins?
* What about projects such as Dia: It's not part of the desktop
release. Does it need a wgo/apps/dia page? Isn't this also confusing for
wgo users?
So: It's not just technical details that makes projects.gnome.org a
necessity.
A simple page like http://www.gnome.org/projects/gedit/ satiesfies
your use cases and the ones above. And it would still do when moved
to http://projects.gnome.org/gedit/.
Cheers,
Claus
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]