Re: gFooBar website
- From: Claus Schwarm <c schwarm gmx net>
- To: Ken VanDine <ken vandine org>
- Cc: marketing-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gFooBar website
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:17:33 +0200
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:19:54 -0400
Ken VanDine <ken vandine org> wrote:
I don't know much about the w.g.o web infrastructure. I am assuming
they are all plain html now, any reason not to use php for them all?
Perhaps we could use a shared set of includes for all project sites
that. Those includes could reference one standard css that is used
for all project sites but could also reference a css unique to each
site that could over ride things. I would really need a better
understanding of the current web infrastructure to really recommend
something, but this is just an idea.
AFAIK, the php code of art.gnome.org was the origin of the security
break last year that resulted in a delay of the 2.6 release. The web
hackers side [1] also says:
"Dynamic content and applications are being replaced with plain pages
where possible to address security and integration considerations.
Features like the Software Map and search must be made from generated
content or moving the service to a hardened server."
I was told something similar by Curtis Hovey [2]:
"The strictest requirement is that the software site *not* be dynamic.
We are moving aways from interactive applications for content features
like this."
Thus, drupal is not an option, Quim.
Cheers,
Claus
[1] http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gwh/
[2] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-web-list/2004-September/msg00036.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]