RE: [Fwd: Re: New supporter]

["Oriol Ribera" <oriol ribera genaker net>]

Hi Luis,
        Thanks for your clarification but really no need for it. I know the
way opensource projects work like.

        I was interested in the task that John is doing which I understand
it provides some kind of informative material about use cases, or features
descriptions to developers.

        In additions ¿do we have at Gnome some kind or "map" or current
supported features in detail?

Best Regards,
Oriol

________________________________________

Oriol Ribera 
Business Development Manager

Genaker 
www.genaker.net

Mobile: (+34) 629 272 657 
oriol ribera genaker net
_______________________________________

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Luis Villa [mailto:luis villa gmail com] 
Enviado el: martes, 05 de julio de 2005 21:44
Para: Quim Gil; Oriol Ribera
CC: marketing list
Asunto: Re: [Fwd: Re: New supporter]

Oriol, others:

I want to repeat for the record, as I've said elsewhere, that the
GNOME technology roadmap is driven by the people who write the code.
As volunteers, or as people working for corporations with their own
goals, the people who do the hard work of driving GNOME set their own
goals and their own visions[1]. We as individuals may choose to
participate in that goal setting process by means of persuasion (using
research, reason, etc.) but he marketing team has not been, and will
not be, a group which sets policy or goals. We don't employ hackers,
and so, any claims that we should or will set policy is not only
unlikely to get things done, but is likely to backfire and make us
*less* influential.

Now, I think what John is pushing for in terms of research (and what
at least one other party is quietly working on) is a great thing for
us to do, as it gives developers tools they can use to make good
decisions about the future of the product. If anyone on the marketing
team wants to work towards goal setting, that's the way to do it-
build a very strong case and take it to developers, and assist them in
understanding the nuances that make you feel the way you do. That kind
of persuasive research and communication, among peers[2], is the only
way we can influence the technological direction of GNOME.

FWIW-
Luis

[1] this slide and some of the others from this talk are relevant:
http://tieguy.org/talks/GUADEC-2002-html/img11.html

[2] or better yet, not among peers, as the hackers can write GNOME
without us, but we have nothing to market without them!

On 7/4/05, Quim Gil <qgil interactors coop> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Oriol Ribera" <oriol ribera genaker net>
> To: "'Leslie Proctor'" <proctors pacbell net>, "'Quim Gil'"
> <qgil interactors coop>, "'Xavier Conde Rueda'" <xavi conde gmail com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:32:53 +0200
> Subject: Re: New supporter
>  
>  
>
> Hi Leslie, Quim and Xavier, 
>
>  I have perceived that the marketing list is quite oriented towards
> promotion events of Gnome. Do you have a clue of the marketing person that
> handles or drives the Gnome roadmap of functionalities? 
>
>  
>
> Best Regards, 
>
> Oriol 
>
>  
>
> ________________________________________ 
>
>  
>
> Oriol Ribera 
>  Business Development Manager 
>
>
>  Genaker 
>
> www.genaker.net 
>
>  
>
> Mobile: (+34) 629 272 657 
>
> oriol ribera genaker net 
>
> _______________________________________ 
>
>  
> --
> marketing-list mailing list
> marketing-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list