Re: [Ekiga-list] About Ekiga, and possible evolution

[Eugen Dedu <Eugen Dedu pu-pm univ-fcomte fr>]

David Andrey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 10.0.0.120
> I have the following networks: 172.a.b.c / 172.x.y.c / 192.u.v.y / 192.f.g.h
> What do you mean with "-d 4" output ?

http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Debugging_Ekiga#How_to_get_a_debug_output

> I will try to make a wireshark trace (after the holidays).
>
> MJPEG
> For the MJPEG, you are right ... it's big. Who can be interested ? Everyone who want to have a video stream to the iPhone. iPhone SDK do not provide access to the MPEG-4 / H.264 decoders. So MJPEG is at this time the only way it seems. 
>
> Net. Interface
> I have a Desktop with more than 1 Network card. So, it could be very useful to set on which interface Ekiga is listening / sending.

If I understood correctly, ekiga sends on all interfaces until it 
receives the registration, an then it uses that interface to send from. 
 Are you connected to Internet through two interfaces?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ekiga-list-bounces gnome org [mailto:ekiga-list-bounces gnome org] On Behalf Of Eugen Dedu
> Sent: Montag, 20. Juli 2009 18:49
> To: Ekiga mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] About Ekiga, and possible evolution
>
> David Andrey wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >  
> >
> > First of all ... thanks for Ekiga ! Great software and works well.
> >
> >  
> >
> > I use Ekiga version 3.0.2 (Windows) to test our embedded SIP Endpoint
> > since some weeks now. It will not be any concurrence J (PC is still
> > needed on the other end).
> >
> > I could see that sometimes Ekiga replies on SIP INVITE with a
> > destination IP of 10.0.0.120.  This IP does not exists on my networks
> > (172.x.x.x).  Is this a know issue ?
>
> No.  What is your ifconfig output?  Could you also send us the -d 4 output?
>
> > For my  use, it will be great to have the following features:
> >
> > 1.       MJPEG Codec, RFC 2435
>
> This is a very big codec, each frame is a JPEG, I personally do not 
> think that someone wants to implement it.
>
> > 2.       Choice of the Network Interface
>
> Could you explain more?  And why do you need that?
>
> > Will be a Version 3.2.x for Windows available soon ?
>
> Yes, see previous e-mails on the list.