Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] Could not unregister, regression
- From: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- To: Ekiga development mailing list <ekiga-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] Could not unregister, regression
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:55:02 +0200
Le lundi 15 juin 2009 à 13:47 +0200, Michael Rickmann a écrit :
> ...snip
> > > Looking at a -d 4, it seems that ekiga asks to unregister by trying to
> > > register again, and gets a 489 Bad event back...
> > >
> > > Perhaps my recent refactoring of the account code is responsible for the
> > > problem...
> >
> > Uh... from lib/engine/components/opal/sip-endpoint.cpp :
> > bool
> > Opal::Sip::EndPoint::subscribe (const Opal::Account & account)
> > {
> > if (account.get_protocol_name () != "SIP")
> > return false;
> >
> > new subscriber (account, *this);
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> >
> > bool
> > Opal::Sip::EndPoint::unsubscribe (const Opal::Account & account)
> > {
> > if (account.get_protocol_name () != "SIP")
> > return false;
> >
> > new subscriber (account, *this);
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > Is it me or is it doing the same thing in both cases !?
> >
> > Snark
>
> I was wondering about that one as well. All I can say is that the
> unsubscribe was not used. When studying Ekiga#s exit, I had outcommented
> it by a diff the file date of which is Mo 8 Jun and the linker did not
> complain. Now unsubscribe is called.
I suppose account is disabled in one case and not in the other.
--
_ Damien Sandras
(o-
//\ Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/
FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/
SIP Phone : sip:dsandras ekiga net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]