Re: thanks for nothing



On 31/01/2014 09:41, somebody who carez wrote:
Dia is a very useful tool. Thanks for everything!

The listed contributors do the real job.I have nothing to do with that: I just sent a patch years ago.

Free Software don't needs for complains or thanks: it needs for patches, traces, and reporting. Slavko has done a good reporting below. And I said changes are simple to author.

It's simple to take care :)

Regards,
TSFH

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Thomas HARDING <tom thomas-harding name <mailto:tom thomas-harding name>> wrote:

    On 30/01/2014 20:39, Slavko wrote:


        My description was verbose with the demonstration at once. It
        was very
        simple, e.g.:

        + take look into shape lists and select appropriate one
        + click on shape and click to workplace to add it
        + select proper line type
        + find the connection point (by change the shape color)
        + select text tool
        + add descriptive name
        + here you can enable snap to grid
        + snapping is as this
        + etc


        My students are lazy to read anything (except the facebook ;-)
        ), they
        have a problem to understand the written description at all.
        Not, they
        have not a mental problems (i am not sure with this English term),
        but they are modern young people (cca 17-18 years old)...

    [I should improve my English too]
    <g>
    Maybe you could upload that description with (localized) captures
    on Facebook, or, incredibly more fun, by authoring a video (with
    beer and pizza) you'll upload tu Youtube -- screen recording
    sucks, but if you has an old 14" cathodic monitor and, more, you
    film yourself handi webcam /with bearb/, that could rocks ;)
    </g>

        I am not sure now, is somewhere the tutorial in "Get started"
        style?

    No, at least in furbished manuals not in the training course step
    by step way.

    Actually there is the Dia manual, Chapter 2, entitled "Quickstart"
    (Dia manual is on "help button"), where Chapter 5 would be more
    relevant to actually quickstart the sketch itself.

    Unfortunately Chapter 2 is mostly a text synopsis (1 capture
    only?), notably linked back once to another section. Also the
    Manual  nodes are sliced to subsections level and that breaks too
    much the reading flow on most section: sometimes nodes are shorter
    than that paragraph -- while some nodes would be /really/ too
    verbose once section level sliced.

    That is easily tunable on xsl transformation (from Dia sources) as
    it is Docbook (I don't remain if done a switch in the Makefile,
    but I remain Docbook version is 4/xml, so the light combination
    "xmllint/xsltproc" programs will do the drill -- V5 has only xsl
    shema and xsltproc would fail to valid).

    Even not fluent in English, don't use the Dia manual/Polish
    version at all as it is really outdated. Even English version has
    been last revised 2011.

    BTW it is really simple to technically author/compile that bloody
    doc for years. It just need authors :p

    Best Regards,
    Thomas HARDING

    _______________________________________________
    dia-list mailing list
    dia-list gnome org <mailto:dia-list gnome org>
    https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
    FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq
    Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia




_______________________________________________
dia-list mailing list
dia-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq
Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]