Re: Icons/Symbols/Shapes

[Killian De Volder <killian de volder megasoft be>]

I heared from someone that libsvg uses gtkgpix or something, with was not available on windows.

IRC #inkscape freenode:
2012-06-10.log:09:19  su_v: afaiu Inkscape currently uses gdk-pixbuf (librsvg module) for such 'SVG' <image>
2012-06-10.log:09:20  su_v: that's also why linking SVG files via <image> tag fails with current Windows 
version (as well as the latest package for Mac OS X: can't find/load the gdk-pixbuf module)

Maybe this is related ?

On 16-06-12 13:01, vwf wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:18:18AM +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
> > Am 16.06.2012 um 07:56 schrieb vwf:
> >
> > Usual response would be: please include your problematic shape file for analysis,
> > but I've got it off-list. It appears handwritten instead of being based on an original
> > shape export. I've spotted three issues which stress the respective XML parser
> > and might lead to incompatibilities between different library versions:
> >   1) the namespace declaration for xlink is missing [1]
> >   2) 'href' in the svg:image tag is missing the xlink namespace
> >   3) there is a superfluous closing svg:image tag
> Thank you for looking into it. Loading my handwritten shape, exporting
> it from dia, and comparing the two is a good technique. I fixed the
> shape-file, but this does not solve the big problem
>
> >      <svg:image x="2.05" y="1.9" width="8.50044" height="7.45" xlink:href="testshape.svg"/>
> The real problem is in testshape.svg: Linux loads it, Windows not.
> testshape.svg is generated by inkscape.
> _______________________________________________
> dia-list mailing list
> dia-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
> FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq
> Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia