Re: WIndows version compared with Linux

[Chris Green <chris areti co uk>]

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 08:27:54PM +0200, Lars Ræder wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:17:40 +0100, Chris Green <chris areti co uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:42:06PM +0200, Alexander wrote:
> > > Chris Green schrieb:
> > > > If I could get better fonts the Linux version works better for me, how
> > > > can I add fonts to the Linux version?  In particular can I get
> > > > something like Letter Gothic in Linux?
> > >
> > > On SuSE Linux I just import them automatically into X-Server (via
> > > Control Center or YaST). Maybe read some documentation of your
> > > distribution?! If you're running a windows license you're allowed to use
> > > even TTF's on Linux, via symbolic links (and no copying) you even don't
> > > break any licensing rules. Otherwise look "http://www.schriftart.net/";
> > > (german) for free fonts or treat google the right way. (Some
> > > distributions include a lot of free fonts.)
> > I didn't think dia used the X fonts but maybe it does.
> >
> > I'm not sure how to install new fonts on Slackware, that's my basic
> > problem.  "man -k font" doesn't produce anything useful that I can
> > see.
>
> The most likely place to drop .ttf files is
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/truetype.  I think that's defined by LSB and
> X together.  That's what I use on RedHat & SuSE.
Well it would appear to be /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF on my
slackware system and that certianly has the fonts that dia can see so
maybe I'll try copying some more .ttf files into there, thanks!

-- 
Chris Green (chris areti co uk)

    "Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence."