Re: Autorouting accessible blah [Re: Roadmap for 0.92]

[Lars Clausen <lrclause cs uiuc edu>]

On 1 Aug 2003, Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> > then how about:
> > <point x="3" y="2">
> > <north/>
> > <south/>
> > <west/>
> > </point>
>
> Maybe
>
> <point ...><directions><north/><south/><west/></directions></point>
>
> No <directions> tag at all = leave default (your version makes it hard to
> differentiate "no directions open" from "use default directions"). Of
> course, the question is - is such a situation (no directions, hence no
> autorouting for that point) legal ? If not, your version is OK.

If that becomes an issue (which I doubt), we could add an attribute saying
that the default state for a direction is closed.

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| HÃrdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?