Re: Waiting for a call, xeyes, and vector fields

[Dave Hoover <spamless4 iasun2 epfl ch>]

Lars Clausen wrote:

> Actually, I have an idea to make a multi-prop widget that's collapsible.
> That would neatly take care of such cluttering, and then it'd be ok to have
> it on the standard line.
>  
Sounds great.

>  
>
> > 2.    In the xeyes demo, you probably noticed the funny connection
> > points floating around by themselves.  These connection points are
> > half-way between the line handles, even if the lines are drawn
> > somewhere else due of the gap parameters.  
> >    
> [...]
>
> It should be in the middle of the displayed area.  Fixing that in CVS.
>  
Go ahead if you have time and want to do it.  Otherwise, I think I have 
figured out how to do it.  Tell
me if you want me to send you a diff for CVS with all of the recent 
changes (the CVS can't do the xeyes demo
until it's patched a bit more).  

<   if (line->absolute_start_gap || line->absolute_end_gap || 
line->fractional_start_gap || line->fractional_end_gap) {
<     Point gap_endpoints[2];
<    
<     calculate_gap_endpoints(line, gap_endpoints);
<     
connpointline_putonaline(line->cpl,&gap_endpoints[0],&gap_endpoints[1]);
<   } else {
<     
connpointline_putonaline(line->cpl,&conn->endpoints[0],&conn->endpoints[1]);
<   }
---
>   
connpointline_putonaline(line->cpl,&conn->endpoints[0],&conn->endpoints[1]);

> > But what happens when all gaps are
> > zero?  In this case, the connection points will coincide with the
> > handles.  Will this screw anything up?  It seems like it shouldn't,
> > since the box object has connection points that coincide with the
> > handles.  Since connection points may change in the future for this
> > new line object, either they should be disabled completely, or they
> > should be fixed to coincide with the VISIBLE line (maybe requiring
> > changes to connpoint_line.c), or a simple static connection point
> > configuration should be made with start/center/end of visible line
> > connections.  What do you think?
> >    
>
> Same thing would happen if you make a zero-length line regardless of gap.
> The analogy to box isn't good, as those are different kinds of handles
> (non-connectible).
>
>  
Yes.  In fact, I patched dia-0.9 with the above code, and had problems 
with the xeyes demo.  The
field-line arrows had the connection points at the same place as the 
handles.  So, like the case of
the zero-length line you mention above, the connection point was on the 
handle (and the handle turned
red, as if it was connected to something).  When I tried to changed the 
gaps of one of these arrows
to 0,0,0,0, the line freaked out.

Also, with the above _putonaline changes, I could not add more 
connection points to version 0.9.  But I have a hunch
this will work out of the box in CVS, because it seems like handles 
can't connect with their own connection
points as easily...looks like you've had problems before--that you've 
fixed...

We should add connection points to the ends of the visible line as well.

Dave.