Re: DiaFont abstraction and namespacing

[Cyrille Chepelov <cyrille chepelov org>]

Le Sun, Jun 23, 2002, à 04:26:28PM +0200, Hans Breuer a écrit:


> > Yes, I selected that, because on my system, plain "monospace" and "sans" are
> > flat out ugly. 
> Having a ugly font for 'monospace', 'sans', 'serif' is a Pango 
> configuration problem. There is some pango.aliases file which
> needs to be adapted to make these font's look nice. Otherwise
> your widget fonts won't look nice too ...

It's set in the themes.
 
> > We should fix Lars' selector to keep only the first valid 
> > item of a comma-separated list (Pango does this on its side).
> IMO fixing at the wrong place ... With this approach we'll
> hardcode families again. Depending on a proper Pango 
> configuration aems right to me. 

Hmmm. Fair enough.
 

> > > > (there are so many
> > > > available families on my system I have to scroll through three
> screenfuls of
> > > > the font widget -- with 1024 dots of vertical resolution).
> > > Is this the new kind of useability, menus about 3072 pixels long :-) ?
> >
> > Ahem.
> One issue with my approach is where to get the first few fonts
> to display. But again this could fall back to 'Sans', 'Serif',
> 'Monospace' which have to exist with any working Pango installation.

Yes. I think that by default, we should only specify those fonts. Of course,
we must let the user be free of using whatever fonts are available on his
system.

        -- Cyrille

-- 
Grumpf.