Re: updated ru.po

[Lars Clausen <lrclause cs uiuc edu>]

On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le Wed, Jun 12, 2002, à 02:51:04PM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
> > On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> > > Le Wed, Jun 12, 2002, à 02:23:26PM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
> > >
> > > > Sorry about that, I've been wrangling with the encoding issue, and
> > > > was intending to send this to myself.  But now that it's out -- does
> > > > it look good, or is it still cut into little pieces?
> > >
> > >                            ?
> >
> > I've had problems with encodings splitting my mail into little pieces.
> > In particular, your attribution line seems to give this problem, unless
> > I force utf-8 on it.
>
> Oh, the mail message ! No, it was fine (I was afraid you were talking
> about ru.po)
>
> What is curious, is that my attribution line should pass well through
> both latin1 and 0; and since you're not putting any funny characters
> (your .sig looks like a latin1 .sig), I don't see why you have to force
> into UTF-8 or break into little pieces ?

I don't know either.  It seems to like 8859-15:(  Unless I force a charset
on the reply command, it complains about multipartness.

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?