Re: updated ru.po



Le Wed, Jun 12, 2002, à 02:51:04PM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
Le Wed, Jun 12, 2002, à 02:23:26PM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:

Sorry about that, I've been wrangling with the encoding issue, and was
intending to send this to myself.  But now that it's out -- does it look
good, or is it still cut into little pieces?

                            ?

I've had problems with encodings splitting my mail into little pieces.  In
particular, your attribution line seems to give this problem, unless I
force utf-8 on it.

Oh, the mail message ! No, it was fine (I was afraid you were talking about
ru.po)

What is curious, is that my attribution line should pass well through both
latin1 and 0; and since you're not putting any funny characters (your .sig
looks like a latin1 .sig), I don't see why you have to force into UTF-8 or
break into little pieces ?

        -- Cyrille

-- 
Grumpf.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]