Re: Porting applications to meson

[Iñigo Martínez <inigomartinez gmail com>]

I don't know where libgepub does belong in that list (core-deps
maybe?), but it's done[0]. I will try to get totem done.

Best regards,

[0] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782994#c1

2017-05-23 16:09 GMT+02:00 Javier Jardón <jjardon gnome org>:
> On 23 May 2017 at 10:14, Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 09:55 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
> > > I've been thinking on doing this for a while, so here you go:
> > >
> > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/MesonPorting
> >
> >         Hi,
> > do not count with evolution* for now, please. I'm not willing to change
> > their build system again, that soon after the change to CMake. I'm
> > quite happy with CMake, to be honest.
> >
> > And as long as its dependencies like WebKitGTK+ or libical use CMake,
> > thus it's needed for Continuous, jhbuild, and what-so-ever-other
> > consumers, there's really not much need to change to Meson for these,
> > from my point of view.
> >
> > I know each has its parts which can do better than the other, that's
> > pretty common. The suggested effort may work for Meson as an advertise
> > and to popularize it, which can be also good for Meson, no doubt.
>
> Sure, this is more to coordinate effort and avoid duplicating effort
>
> Also help people that are interested to port and need some examples to
> get started
>
>
> Cheers,
> Javier Jardón
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list