Re: GNOME goal candidates

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:12:17PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 14:22 -0500, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
I think installed test etc it's not going to happen or be maintained
if we don't enable coverage with it too. I think that's the actual
trick that will keep us up with the initiative.

So I would go with both since the start, and together.

OK then. Does anybody want to take ownership of this? It'd require
updating the goal pages to match the new best practices, maybe merging
them together, and updating the list of affected modules.

I can take ownership of:

I will update the description.

For the list of modules, I can merge the current list with the list

I'll not actively see if more modules can be marked as done, nor file
bugs for every module, that's a task for each individual module

I'm not sure it is a good idea to merge the two goals (installed tests +
code coverage). When filing a bug in bugzilla, it should cover only one
task. The installed tests make sense only if it'll actually be used, for
example by GNOME Continuous. I don't know if all modules listed in the
Template page are built by GNOME Continuous.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]