Re: GNOME goal candidates

[Carlos Soriano <csoriano protonmail com>]

I think installed test etc it's not going to happen or be maintained if we don't enable coverage with it too. I think that's the actual trick that will keep us up with the initiative.

So I would go with both since the start, and together.

Best regards,

Carlos Soriano

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: GNOME goal candidates

Local Time: March 1, 2017 8:05 PM

UTC Time: March 1, 2017 7:05 PM

From: swilmet gnome org

To: desktop-devel-list gnome org

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:31:24AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:

> OK, you all have changed my mind. I guess installed tests should be a

> goal.

>

> Do we want to do this for coverage as well...?

https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/AddCodeCoverage

The page needs to be updated for AX_CODE_COVERAGE. But I would keep it,

at least to have a list of best-practices as Emmanuele said.

--

Sébastien

_______________________________________________

desktop-devel-list mailing list

desktop-devel-list gnome org

https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list