On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 21:40 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
Hi, Philip Withnall wrote:On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:07 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:I'm a bit surprised by 1) but we could certainly automatically produce a list of maintainers / modules/ time/commits since last release, if that could be useful.I think 1) would be useful because I have a load of modules which I am not sure if they need to follow the main GNOME release schedule. I had a nagging fear they should, but then nobody poked me about doing a release, so I forgot to check up further. As a result, a lot of my modules haven’t had releases following the schedule. (Sorry if I have been a total pain because of this.) Would such a list be useful for the release team, as a way of tracking who needs nagging? If so, then I hope producing it should not be too much of a drain on your time — if it is a drain, then you probably shouldn’t do it.This was mostly done manually (at least as far I am concerned), but here is an experiment, https://people.gnome.org/~fpeters/health/wanted-releases.html And the red modules are first targets. (this has been generated from my local clones, updated a few hours ago, if it's something we want to pursue it would be quite nice to have this automated and running on GNOME infrastructure) (the disk requirements exclude openshift).
Nice! If it's not much effort to get this running on GNOME infrastructure, I think it would be useful, and have it linked from the release reminder e-mails. What do the x/y numbers mean? Philip
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part