Re: Killing off UNCONFIRMED in Bugzilla
- From: Rick Opper <rickopper gmail com>
- To: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Killing off UNCONFIRMED in Bugzilla
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:39:29 +0100
OK... So they just stay "new" then... I'm not sure that would give the original reporter the impression that something is being done, but as long as the bugs do get confirmed, sorted, whatever then any simplification may be helpful...
On February 13, 2015 6:20:15 PM CET, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 18:15 +0100, Rick Opper wrote:
Then how will project devs know if a bug is - as the status implies -
not yet confirmed? It may be a problem with a single users unique
setup,
Which is still a bug, and it's still "new".
or a design decision
RESOLVED WONTFIX
, or caused by something specific to a certain distribution...
RESOLVED NOTGNOME
Isn't that
the
point of this tag?
There are other statuses available which already cover those cases.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]