Re: Requiring systemd for the gnome-settings-daemon power plugin

[Sebastien Bacher <seb128 ubuntu com>]

Le 19/10/2012 15:41, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> I don't think that is a very productive way to have a discussion. What
> are you hoping to achieve ?
The discussion went this way:
1: "g-s-d will drop non systemd support"
2: could we define standard interface that are up to the distributor to 
implement rather than depends on systemd? an hard depends would mean 
those choices for non systemd distributors: <list of options I could see>
1: "no, I don't intend to spend any time on that, if you don't want to 
use systemd you need to work with systemd upstream"
2: "ok, well I guess we need to think what to do then, but it's limiting 
our options to get GNOME shipped"

I'm not sure how "unproductive" it has been, it's merely stating intends 
and sharing concerns...

What I'm hoping to achieve? I guess letting know GNOME, as a project, 
know in what position this choice put some of the distributors and what 
might be the outcome. It's sharing information and communicating ... is 
there any issue with that?

Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher