Re: 3.6 Feature: IBus/XKB integration

[Marguerite Su <i marguerite su>]

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Ma Xiaojun <damage3025 gmail com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Aron Xu <aronxu gnome org> wrote:
>> After a long discussion with Mr. Ma privately (3 hours with instant
>> messaging), here are the points he would like to make, which is not
>> acceptable by us obviously:
> Don't disclose my private opinions next time.
> In fact, I'm grateful for your spending time discussing this issue with me!
>

be careful! there're somthing called TOC here.

GNOME ML is not the court for you personal affairs.

the only personal affair accepted is, RIP note.

and you'll surely not be the person to send it.

>> 1. Integration is good, so no matter if now is the right time he'd
>> like to ask people to prove the concept, regardless possible breakage
>> on user's side.
>>
>> 2.The broken state by doing such integration right now is foreseeable
>> and expected, and is truly what Mr. Ma wants. Because that would force
>> someone to work on those items theoretically. And definitely Mr. Ma
>> isn't the one who would like to do the work.
>>
>> 3.Ubuntu's pushing broken Unity (no offensive, this is just what
>> concluded by Mr. Ma) is an example he would like everyone else to
>> learn, that is to say let users suffer so they'll try to improve.
> For breakage/regression, I don't think it must happen. Even if it
> happens, I think it is not that bad.

not that bad? right. it's the worst case to CJK users.

then you can only reply on mouth input like disabled persons.

although GNOME is really good at such technologies.

that's not what we want.

> For right time, I don't think starting from now is that bad. I didn't
> propose this project, it's up to the real people behind.

like I said, what you think does not even matter.

all other emails are based on facts. yours, theory.

so please don't flood this ML any more.

it'll give GNOME developers bad impression of the whole CJK community.

Regards

Marguerite.