Re: 3.6 Feature: IBus/XKB integration
- From: Justin Wong <justin w xd gmail com>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 3.6 Feature: IBus/XKB integration
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 05:39:06 +0800
5. there has been solutions to integrate IM frameworks with gnome
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/68/input-method-status-indicator/
in which kimpanel extension can work with both ibus and fcitx. there is no dark magic.
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Justin Wong
<justin w xd gmail com> wrote:
1. ibus is buggy
2. Even though iBus is perfect, it should not be the integrated IM of gnome, if only ibus is integrated, the only thing i can do is just give up gnome because ibus cannot meet my need, if only fcitx is integrated, maybe ibus users would give up gnome because they need ibus
3. U MUST give users choices.
4. There is a solution like "input method frameworks' framework" which can be integrated with most im frameworks, just like KDE's kimpanel.
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Shaun McCance
<shaunm gnome org> wrote:
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 00:03 +0800, Weng Xuetian wrote:
> Actually I see this is an impossible mission for gnome.
>
> I see no one here really understand the real needs of input method.
> Fix UI? That's not the main problem of ibus.
I'm having a very hard time following this. Can somebody who knows
what they're talking about (like you or Marguerite) give details on
what the main problems with IBus actually are? You say many users
prefer other IM frameworks, and I believe you, but I don't know why
exactly. How is IBus failing them?
--
Shaun
--
Open Source,Open Mind
Blog: http://bigeagle.me/
E-mail: bigeagle xdlinux info
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
