Re: Feature proposal: Alternative input system based on low-cost webcam

[Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>]

Le lundi 24 octobre 2011, à 01:11 +0200, Piñeiro a écrit :
> On 10/23/2011 02:11 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> And finally, the main concern could be about the graphical toolkit.
> >> eViacam uses wxWidgets [3][4], in order to ensure a native look and feel
> >> on both Windows and Linux systems. wxGTK is the most common wxWidgets
> >> port, meaning that it will be using Gtk+ native widgets wherever
> >> possible. This feature proposal would include the proposal of wxWidgets
> >> as a external dependency.
> > I think both sourceforge and wxWidgets are disqualifying problems.
> 
> There are other apps included on GNOME moduleset but not at GNOME git
> (ie: inkscape is also hosted at sourceforge).

That's the difference between core and non-core. For proper integration
with GNOME (which includes integration in gnome-shell, g-c-c, etc.),
this feature would need to be in core, which has additional
requirements.

Inkscape, on the other hand is not part of GNOME core -- it's a great
application, but it doesn't need any deep integration with the core of
the desktop.

Cheers,

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.