Re: Feature proposal: Alternative input system based on low-cost webcam

On 21 October 2011 17:28, Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com> wrote:
>  * Repositories: right now it is on sourceforge. This shouldn't be a
> blocker thought.

I'm pretty sure it needs to be on

>  * Look and feel: some people could not agree with current interface
> [2]. This shouldn't be a blocker thought.
> This feature proposal would include the proposal of wxWidgets
> as a external dependency.

wxWidgets applications differ lots from "native" applications. I
really don't think depending on wxWidgets is a good idea.

> In addition to wxwidgets, eViacam has also dependencies with opencv and
> libv4l1, that should be included as external dependencies.

Shouldn't eViacam should be ported to libv4l2?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]