Re: 3.4 Features, final round



Found the 2 links where we tried to open this subject...
Me: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2011-October/msg00026.html
Federico: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2011-October/msg00166.html


On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Seif Lotfy <seif lotfy com> wrote:
Hey Sriram
I don't think the new GNOME policies allow me to introduce or suggest Zeitgeist as a policy.
But rather require a feature to require Zeitgeist...
Jump-lists in my opinion require Zeitgeist. Also Federico had sent a mail suggesting the jumplists with Zeitgeist as a feature proposal but somehow nobody even gave it a chance or replied to it...
Cheers
Seif

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <sri ramkrishna me> wrote:


On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Frederic Peters <fpeters gnome org> wrote:
Hello all,


+ Jumplists
 https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Jumplists
 → didn't heard much opinion of it from designers


Jumplists is predicated on choosing an engine like zeitgeist.  So there is a bigger question on how to implement it and using what technology.  No decision has been made on zeitgeist itself, and I don't believe Seif has introduced Zeitgeist as a feature.

sri


_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]