Re: GUPnP inclusion



Hi again,

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeenix gmail com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>   Rygel is planned to included back into GNOME in 3.1 as part of the
> 'Sharing' feature[1]. GUPnP dependencies of Rygel has so far been used
> as blessed external dependencies. Since GUPnP is moving [2] to GNOME
> infrastructure and Rygel development is very closely tied with GUPnP,
> I propose that we now treat GUPnP as part of GNOME (developer
> platform). If we decide to do this, I also recommend we not only take
> the components that Rygel directly depend on[3] but gupnp-tools as
> well since those tools are very useful for developing, testing and
> tracing UPnP issues.

  So I would interpret complete silence as a complete agreement here.
Please speak-up if thats not the case. :)

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]