Re: GUPnP inclusion
- From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak gnome org>
- To: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GUPnP inclusion
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 23:04:04 +0300
Hi again,
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeenix gmail com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Rygel is planned to included back into GNOME in 3.1 as part of the
> 'Sharing' feature[1]. GUPnP dependencies of Rygel has so far been used
> as blessed external dependencies. Since GUPnP is moving [2] to GNOME
> infrastructure and Rygel development is very closely tied with GUPnP,
> I propose that we now treat GUPnP as part of GNOME (developer
> platform). If we decide to do this, I also recommend we not only take
> the components that Rygel directly depend on[3] but gupnp-tools as
> well since those tools are very useful for developing, testing and
> tracing UPnP issues.
So I would interpret complete silence as a complete agreement here.
Please speak-up if thats not the case. :)
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]