Re: GUPnP inclusion

[Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>]

On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 23:04 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeenix gmail com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >   Rygel is planned to included back into GNOME in 3.1 as part of the
> > 'Sharing' feature[1]. GUPnP dependencies of Rygel has so far been used
> > as blessed external dependencies. Since GUPnP is moving [2] to GNOME
> > infrastructure and Rygel development is very closely tied with GUPnP,
> > I propose that we now treat GUPnP as part of GNOME (developer
> > platform). If we decide to do this, I also recommend we not only take
> > the components that Rygel directly depend on[3] but gupnp-tools as
> > well since those tools are very useful for developing, testing and
> > tracing UPnP issues.
> 
>   So I would interpret complete silence as a complete agreement here.
> Please speak-up if thats not the case. :)

Hi Zeeshan,

Could you or another GUPnP developer work with me to create
a page for it in the Platform Overview?

Thanks,
Shaun