Re: GUPnP inclusion
- From: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- To: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GUPnP inclusion
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 16:16:24 -0400
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 23:04 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> Hi again,
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeenix gmail com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Rygel is planned to included back into GNOME in 3.1 as part of the
> > 'Sharing' feature. GUPnP dependencies of Rygel has so far been used
> > as blessed external dependencies. Since GUPnP is moving  to GNOME
> > infrastructure and Rygel development is very closely tied with GUPnP,
> > I propose that we now treat GUPnP as part of GNOME (developer
> > platform). If we decide to do this, I also recommend we not only take
> > the components that Rygel directly depend on but gupnp-tools as
> > well since those tools are very useful for developing, testing and
> > tracing UPnP issues.
> So I would interpret complete silence as a complete agreement here.
> Please speak-up if thats not the case. :)
Could you or another GUPnP developer work with me to create
a page for it in the Platform Overview?
] [Thread Prev