Le mercredi 09 février 2011 à 22:39 +0100, Johannes Schmid a écrit : > Hi! > > Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 22:31 +0100 schrieb Gendre Sebastien: > > ok, but why? Why change these 2 choice is reserved to power-user? > > > > I don't understand the logic behind lack. > > Because all sane use-cases can be handled better way (for example > applications prevent suspend, etc.). I think that has been explained > quite a bit in the previous thread and in the comments on the initial > blog post. Ok, I understand this logic. But it create some other questions in my mind: - Is it already implemented in softwares? - Can we request that to not gnome software (Are we not being ignored)? - If a software prevent suspend and crash, what's going on there? - If a software prevent suspend wan't to force suspend, can he? - That does he not sow confusion among users about how they laptop work? (why it supend when? And why it don't suspend when?) > BTW, I doubt that a discussion on desktop-devel-list will change > anything. Yes, but where? > This is a list to coordinate GNOME development, not about > design/usability/feature decisions because those are mostly done by > individual maintainers/teams. All these choices are personal and make by isolated individuals or is it panned with the community?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part