Re: Call to maintainers: GNOME 2.31 to ship GTK 2.90
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Xavier Claessens <xclaesse gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Call to maintainers: GNOME 2.31 to ship GTK 2.90
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:49:56 +0100
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 18:36 +0200, Xavier Claessens wrote:
> Le 10/06/10 13:27, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> > On 10 June 2010 12:24, Andre Klapper<ak-47 gmx net> wrote:
> >> This requires module maintainers to port their modules now (if you don't
> >> want an angry release-team mob soon in front of your house).
> >
> > So, should we be requesting gtk3>= 2.90 in configure.ac now? At least
> > for Fedora rawhide the lack of gtk-engines makes all the gtk3-using
> > application look fugly.
>
> To make Empathy build with gtk3 we need:
>
> - libcanberra-gtk-3
> - libchamplain-gtk-3
> - libclutter-gtk-3
> - libunique-3 (or drop gtk2 compatibility and use GtkApplication)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618473
Emmanuele could do a release.
> - libwebkit-3
>
> Once they are all released and parallel installable (we would like to
> not lose gtk2 compatibility), we are ready to make the move :-)
Why is losing GTK2 compatibility a problem? It shouldn't matter. You
could create a gnome-2-32 branch and make changes there if you wanted.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]