Re: Modulesets Reorganization

On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 08:55 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 00:37 +0100, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> > 
> > 1. The arbitrary separation between Platform and Bindings can lead
> > people to
> > think that the bindings are second-class citizens while this is
> > certainly not
> > the case. 
> However:
> a) The Platform set clearly tells the Bindings what needs to be bound. 
> b) As long as the release team don't follow their own rules about the
> Bindings then the Bindings will not have the same prestige. Specific
> examples not mentioned here to avoid distraction.
> c) Throwing them all into one big module set won't make the distros any
> more likely to package them with the same amount of love.

I agree with this. Do modulesets need to be disjoined? Otherwise
Bindings could become a subset of Platform...



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]