Re: (L)GPLv3

El mar, 06-07-2010 a las 12:32 -0500, Ted Gould escribió:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:17 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> > It's the GPLv2 in the program code that states "you can't link this 
> > against anything other than GPLv2 code".
> > 
> > Nothing we could add to the library licence (other than dual-licensing
> > under GPLv2) could fix this.
> [...] But, it seems like when we're making a choice between dual-licensing
> v2/3 and v3 with an exception for v2 only -- the exception is the better choice.

Not an expert, but if I understood Ryan correctly, it's v2 which would
need the exception ("This program is licenced under GPL v2 only, but you
may link this against anything (L)GPL regardless of version")


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]