Re: GNOME 3 cleanup status update

From: John Stowers <john stowers lists gmail com>
To: Gustavo Carneiro <gjc inescporto pt>
Cc: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: GNOME 3 cleanup status update
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:06:19 +0100

> 
> Manpower issues aside, PyGObject should be the only Python Bindings
> package in GNOME 3.  I think everyone agrees with this (right?).  We
> are discussing real-life practical issues, but we shouldn't lose sight
> of the ultimate goal.

Can anyone estimate how API compatible pygi+gtk will be with pygtk?

John

References:
- Re: GNOME 3 cleanup status update
  - From: Andre Klapper
- Re: GNOME 3 cleanup status update
  - From: =?UTF-8?Q?Javier_Jard=C3=B3n?=
- Re: GNOME 3 cleanup status update
  - From: Tomeu Vizoso
- Re: GNOME 3 cleanup status update
  - From: Gustavo Carneiro

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]