Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist

On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 07:15 +0000, jhs jsschmid de wrote:
> > We don't have any concrete plans. However moving our tarballs to
> > FTP should pose no problem at all, likewise for i18n. Since we are
> > talking daemons here i18n is not a big part of the project.

> > As for VCS and bug tracking it'll be quite a lot more work on our
> part
> > if we should move. I don't think anyone in the team is directly
> > opposed to the idea, but it's more the fact that it would be a major
> > inconvenience. We make heavy use of Launchpad's branc/review
> features
> > and integration with blueprints and bugs. Of course we can replace
> > this with a hand held combination of bugzilla and wikipages, but it
> > would be a major change in our workflow.

For something that intends to be such a major part of GNOME, not using
GNOME's git and bugzilla is a huge problem. Resisting that wouldn't make
people optimistic about things in future. I can't believe that it's that
big a deal for Zeitgeist, compared with what you'd gain when you need to
work with a much larger set of developers, testers, and users.

It's worth adapting, please, because being in the GNOME Desktop is more
than just getting a stamp of approval.

murrayc murrayc com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]