Re: New Module Proposal. libseed
- From: "Jaap A. Haitsma" <jaap haitsma org>
- To: Sandy Armstrong <sanfordarmstrong gmail com>
- Cc: Hubert Figuiere <hub figuiere net>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: New Module Proposal. libseed
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 08:27:51 +0200
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 03:18, Sandy Armstrong
<sanfordarmstrong gmail com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Hubert Figuiere <hub figuiere net> wrote:
>> On 05/12/2009 08:01 PM, Robert Carr wrote:
>>> For 2.28, it may make sense to have both gjs and Seed as modules, and
>>> try and keep code somewhat compatible.
>>> up being better long term, so we might not want to completely commit
>>> to one yet.
>> With that plan, it is -1 from me. 2 engines is one too many IMHO.
> We'll have two engines if Epiphany moves to webkit and gnome-shell
> sticks with gjs.
> If the only user of gjs in GNOME is gnome-shell, and the gnome-shell
> developers are happy with a move to Seed (have we heard from them on
> this yet?), then I am +1 for Seed's inclusion and gjs' exclusion.
> I agree with Hubert that sending mixed messages about browser/js
> engines is not a good idea.
I agree +1 for seed.
Can you commit to put in the few days work to make a patch for
gnome-shell to use libseed? I think that makes it easy for the
gnome-shell developers to go to libseed
] [Thread Prev