Re: fast-forward only policy

On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:15 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Are you going to argue that this branch is desirable to keep alive for
> all eternity?

I think most reasonable people will say that there is a difference
between branches which were used for development forks and have been
merged (such as this, "feature branches" in git), and maintenance
branches such as gnome-2-26.  Feature branches which have been merged
can and probably should be killed from the repository unless there is a
reason to keep them, but long term maintenance branches should be

Ross Burton                                 mail: ross burtonini com
                                          jabber: ross burtonini com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]